|
|
|
December 2005
Job Opportunities Task Force
This research was funded by the Center for Law and Social Policy. We thank the Center for its support, and acknowledge that the findings and conclusions presented in this report do not necessarily reflect the positions of the Center.
ContentsKey Elements of Effective Bridge Programs
Building a Bridge Program from Current Initiatives A Recipe for a Successful Bridge Program
Introduction Almost half of the adults in Maryland have a high school diploma or less, and many of those with a diploma have low reading and math skills. These individuals don’t have the education level needed to enter college, and they don’t have the skills to obtain and retain a high wage job. If these individuals don’t overcome this deficit, they will be destined to a lifetime of low-wage work and other related economic hardships. While a large percentage of Maryland’s workforce is struggling to get by, many employers are unable to find the skilled workers it needs to compete in a global economy. Employers frequently report difficulty locating trained workers and even more trouble keeping them on the job. The health of the state’s workforce and its economy depend upon eliminating the gap between the skill level of its workforce and the skill level required by many Maryland jobs. In recent years a strategy has emerged to address this problem. Community colleges and businesses have formed partnerships to create programs that teach basic reading, writing, math, English language, and technical skills in the context of a particular occupation. These programs are called “bridge programs” because they are a bridge to post-secondary education and higher skill jobs. Several bridge programs have recently been created in Maryland. While programs that seek to train low-skilled workers are typically initiated by the public sector, employers have been the driving force in the creation of two of Maryland’s bridge programs. This demonstrates employers’ heightened interest in taking the initiative to prepare the workforce for high-skilled jobs. This paper examines the need for bridge programs in Maryland, describes several promising local programs, and lists key factors to consider in designing new bridge programs.
While the components of bridge programs vary somewhat from site to site, the objectives of each program are generally the same: to help the individual access post-secondary education and obtain a high wage job through the combination of occupational skills training and developmental (remedial) education. Often, through the program, the individual pursues a certificate or degree through a community college and frequently services are available to address barriers to program participation and employment. Key elements of effective programs are:
Bridge programs are especially attractive because they are generally shorter in length and more intensive than other adult education courses, and are often linked to a specific employer.
High wage jobs require post-secondary education and strong basic skills. Many Marylanders are shut out of opportunities to earn a good salary because they do not have the required education credential or skill associated with the position. Bridge programs offer an opportunity for residents to pick up a credential, increase their skills and make themselves more attractive to employers offering family-supporting wages. Bridge programs are needed to address the following: Many Marylanders have a high school diploma or less : While a growing percentage of jobs require an advanced degree, 43 percent of adults in Maryland age 25 years and over have only a high school diploma, its equivalent, or less (U.S. Census Bureau, QT-P20, Educational Attainment by Sex: 2000, Census 2000 Summary File 3, Sample Data, Maryland.) Individuals with a college degree earn much more money than those without a degree. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, male workers with a degree earn 75 percent more than those with just a high school diploma. Bridge programs can help residents with a high school degree or less obtain the skills they need to enter post-secondary education. Many low-wage workers who are eager to continue their education in college are not adequately prepared: Statewide in the 2001-2002 school year, 84 percent of recent African-American high school graduates, 80 percent of Hispanic graduates, and 68 percent of white graduates required developmental instruction as they began college (Maryland State Department of Education, “2003 Performance Report” 2003.) Of new high school graduates enrolling in a Maryland community college, 72 percent required developmental education (remedial) in math, reading or writing – or in all three. At Baltimore City Community College an astonishing 96 percent of the students require developmental education in one or more subjects (The Abell Foundation,“Baltimore City Community College at the Crossroads.” March 2002.) Bridge programs can provide educational assistance to give residents the skills they need to succeed in post-secondary education. The state’s adult education system is serving only a small fraction, about 4 percent, of the Marylanders in need of services. The need and the demand for adult education programs in Maryland far exceed the capacity of current programs. According to the Maryland State Department of Education, about 960,000 residents need adult education, current programs have the capacity to enroll fewer than 40,000 at a time, and about 5,000 are on waiting lists. Many state residents have very low levels of literacy : According to the National Adult Literacy Survey, 20 percent of adult Marylanders read at the lowest literacy level. This means that they read at less than a 4 th grade level and cannot understand instructions. Another 25 percent of the state’s adults read at the second literacy level – approximately the 8 th grade level. Literacy experts say these adults are likely to be unprepared to study for the GED and are unable to help their children learn to read (Maryland State Department of Education, “Literacy Works,” 2001.)
Given bridge program’s potential, we sought to determine if successful models existed in Maryland. We conducted extensive research and surveyed Maryland’s community college system. We found the following three promising bridge programs.
There are two ways to build a bridge program. One is to start from scratch, bring together partners and create a new initiative that will meet the needs of residents, employers and educational institutions. The Baltimore Magna Technical Training Center is a good example of this type of program. The other way to start a bridge program is to redesign existing programs that work with low-skilled adults and build stronger linkages to post-secondary education and employment. A number of community colleges across the state offer programs that help individuals move up the education and employment ladders. While conducting research to locate existing bridge programs, we found the following initiatives that provide some bridge-like services and could conceivably be expanded with the right partners to become full-fledged bridge programs.
· Harford Community College offers “supplemental instruction”, a series of free weekly review sessions for students taking difficult courses. Students who have successfully completed the course discuss important concepts and help the other students improve their study skills. · Chesapeake College offers classes in basic use of computers, research skills, and other basic level skills. · Anne Arundel Community College offers a 15-hour, non-credit Elementary Computer Skills course for students with limited computer experience.
Bridge programs have lofty ambitions. They target people with relatively little education and low-skills and seek to increase their potential by helping them to access post-secondary education and prepare them for a high-skill, high wage career. Educators, employers, policymakers and advocates should consider the following when developing a bridge program: · Focus on growing industry sectors where the demand for skilled labor is strong and wages can support families. Bridge programs need employers as partners. Employers are likely to be most interested in investing resources in a bridge initiative if they have had difficulty finding skilled workers using more traditional methods. Consequently, planners should target growing industry sectors with labor shortages when designing a bridge program. · Ensure that the promise of a job is real, meaningful and well publicized within the program and the community. Many low-income residents have tried training programs before that did not lead to a job and did not raise their income significantly. This leaves people skeptical about any new training program with big promises. To gain prospective participant’s attention and trust, the program must fulfill its promise of leading to a high-wage job after successful completion of activities. Participants who advance in careers that pay a high salary will be the program’s best marketing tool. · Determine the program’s target population and tailor services accordingly: A program designed to help residents with the lowest literacy level will likely need to focus on helping participants enter employment in the short-term with post-secondary education a longer range objective. The program will also need to rely more heavily on services that can resolve participant’s barriers to work and education. Programs aimed at participants with higher levels of literacy may be able to concentrate more quickly on preparing participants for college. These individuals may already be working, such as in the Good Samaritan model described above, and need training to advance their careers and increase their wages. · When determining the length of the training program, balance the needs of participants and the time needed to teach the skills; provide stipends when possible. Low-wage workers and job seekers need to earn money to provide for their families. No matter how good the long-term prospects are, many individuals do not have the means to enroll in a lengthy training program that does not provide a wage. Also, if the program is very long, participants may drop out due to barriers to participation or in favor of an opportunity that will provide assistance more quickly. Employers however, need skilled, reliable workers. The program must be long enough to provide adequate training and produce workers with the capacity to do the job. If the training is too short and does not provide skilled workers, employers will quickly lose interest and stop hiring graduates. · Secure funding. Finding sufficient funds can be challenging. Possible state government sources include the Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation, the Maryland State Department of Education, and the Department of Business and Economic Development. Federal funds through the Workforce Investment Act may be available and Pell grants may be an option for credit programs. Private employers, sectoral associations, and foundations are also possibilities. Other potential funding possibilities can be found in “Building Bridges: Funding options for the core components of Bridge Programs.” (Smith and Unruth, May 2004). · Address barriers to program participation and employment: Many individuals have barriers that have resulted in limited success in the workplace and in school. To give the program its best chance of success, program operators should be prepared to address issues such as childcare, transportation, and healthcare, or refer students elsewhere for assistance. The seriousness of participants’ skills deficits and other issues was raised as an important consideration by staff at all three of the programs described above. · Form partnerships with organizations that will work well together: Sometimes partnerships that look great on paper are disasters in practice. Too many partnerships are formed without enough attention on how activities will be coordinated so that participants or services do not fall through cracks. Bridge programs are a challenge because they require the cooperation of employers, academic institutions, and sometimes community based organizations -- entities that have very different missions, priorities and orientations. Coordination can also be a challenge within organizations, particularly educational institutions where sections that offer credits, degrees and certificates must align with the non-credit side that provides ABE, GED, and ESL instruction. Without an effective partnership a bridge program has little chance of success. · Find the most appropriate organization to provide the education and training: While there are a number of organizations that could provide educational training in a bridge program, community colleges are well situated to provide this service. Community colleges mission includes serving as a bridge to four-year colleges while also responding to workforce needs of local employers through college credit and noncredit offerings. A more extensive discussion of the issues to consider when designing a bridge program can be found within ‘Bridges to Careers for Low-Skilled Adults: A Program Development Guide” (Women Employed with Chicago Jobs Council, and UIC Great Cities Institute) available on the Internet at www.womenemployed.org and at www.cjc.net.
Bridge program are an exciting concept because they improve the employment prospects of workers and job seekers and meet the high-skill needs of employers. Many Marylanders do not have the skills or education to go to and succeed in college or to obtain and retain a high-wage job. Current services only scratch the surface of satisfying the need of residents and the demand of employers. Learning from the experience of the programs already implemented and addressing early on the key issues suggested above will go a long way to ensuring the effectiveness of future bridge programs.
Jenkins, Davis, Career Pathway Primer and Planning Guide, University of Illinois at Chicago, October 2003. Jenkins, Davis, and Stephanie Sommers, A Bridge to Community College Career Programs for Adults with Poor Basic Skills, Great Cities Institute, University of Illinois at Chicago, April 2004. Jobs for the Future and the National Council for Workforce Education, Breaking Through: Helping Low-Skilled Adults Enter and Succeed in College and Careers, November 2004. Job Opportunities Task Force, Connecting Low-Income Families to Good Jobs: A Policy Road Map for Maryland, 2004. Smith, Whitney et al, The Bridge Program: An Effective Educational Approach to Meeting Employers’ Critical Skills Shortages, Women Employed, May 2004. Smith, Whitney and Rachel Unruh, Building Bridges: Funding options for the core components of Bridge programs, Chicago Jobs Council and Women Employed, May 2004. Women Employed with the Chicago Jobs Council and UIC Great Cities Institute, Bridges to Careers for Low-Skilled Adults: A Program Development Guide, October 2005.
JOTF would like to thank the following for their assistance with this report:
|
|||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2003 Job Opportunities Task Force. All rights reserved. 207 East Redwood Street, Suite 1000, Baltimore, MD 21202 | (410) 234-8040 | (410) 234-8929 fax | info@jotf.org Privacy Statement | Site design and development by Velir Studios |